|


|
October 9, 2009 Commentary: "He won what?!"Posted: 01:20 PM ET
By Roland S. Martin CNN Political Contributor Editor's note: A nationally syndicated columnist, Roland S. Martin is the author of "Listening to the Spirit Within: 50 Perspectives on Faith" and "Speak, Brother! A Black Man's View of America." Visit his Web site for more information. ![]() "He won what?!" That's how I greeted the news this morning at 6 a.m. EDT when my buddy, April Ryan, White House correspondent for the American Urban Radio Networks, called to tell me about President Barack Obama winning the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize. She and I were supposed to discuss Rep. Charlie Rangel's ethics investigation on my daily segment on the Tom Joyner Morning Show, but the shocking news clearly changed that agenda. As I turned on the TV to watch how it was playing out, it wasn't surprising to listen to the instant analysis, much of it hyper-critical. Why the Norwegian Nobel Committee made such a decision barely nine months into his presidency was a worthy question. So instead of popping off, I wanted to go deeper, and there is no better explanation than the committee's rationale. "Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world's attention and given its people hope for a better future. His diplomacy is founded in the concept that those who are to lead the world must do so on the basis of values and attitudes that are shared by the majority of the world's population," according to text of the Nobel Prize citation. "For 108 years, the Norwegian Nobel Committee has sought to stimulate precisely that international policy and those attitudes for which Obama is now the world's leading spokesman. The Committee endorses Obama's appeal that 'Now is the time for all of us to take our share of responsibility for a global response to global challenges.'" "Hope for a better future." That folks, is the key line. In many ways the 2008 presidential election was more about the future than the past; more about hope of what we could and should be, rather than the status quo. And the unanimous decision of the Nobel committee follows that line of thinking. As fierce advocates for peace, the folks behind the Nobel Prize clearly didn't want the award to be a lifetime achievement award. It really speaks to the positive force of change President Obama is trying to usher in, and to establish a new mindset, especially as to how the United States will approach global issues.
The award also offers a challenge to America's president because he will have to live up to the title. Like it or not, once you are a Nobel Peace prize winner, you are in rarified air, perceived as a larger-than-life figure who is all about advancing the ideals of your newfound prestige. Yes, being the president of the United States is considered the most important job in the world, but every decision President Obama makes on the international front will now be seen through the prism of meeting the subjective gold standard of a Nobel winner. Afghanistan? It puts pressure on him to make it more than about flexing American military might, but truly making the world safer. He will have the additional pressure of securing peace in the Middle East. And he will have to further deliver on his pledge to heal the divide between Muslim countries and the United States. The Nobel folks are not dumb. They are smart individuals who understand where we stand as a world, and clearly want President Obama to represent their vision for global understanding and peace. His haters will say he's unworthy and hasn't accomplished anything for winning the Nobel Peace prize. But maybe the real question they want answered, and only he can, isn't "what have you done for me lately?" but "what are you prepared to do?" The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Roland Martin. |
Tomorrow
We have the top stories that you need to know. Tomorrow 8P ET.
Campbell Brown anchors CNN’s nightly news program at 8p ET. Prior to joining CNN, she worked with NBC News for 11 years. She served as co-anchor of Weekend Today, as the main substitute anchor for Brian Williams, and as NBC News' White House correspondent during President George W. Bush's first term. | BIO MSquared
MSquared is a spirited debate on everything under the sun... not politics, but things you might be talking about at home! Recent Posts
Categories
|